Mr. Justice Pigeon in Steinberg's Ltd. v. Comite paritaire de l'alimenta- tion au detail, [1968] S.C.R. 971, at p. 983 (translation) explaining McKay v. The Queen said: "... the rule in McKay v. The Queen is not that a legislative enactment must at all cost be interpreted so as to remain intra vires. It is rather that when faced with two possible interpretations, that which avoids invalidity must be preferred."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.