Lamer, J. also cited with approval the comments of Dickson, J. (as he then was) in Marcotte v. The Deputy Attorney General of Canada, 1974 CanLII 1 (SCC), [1976] 1 S.C.R. 108 (S.C.C.), which stated the principle as follows: Even if I were to conclude that the relevant statutory provisions were ambiguous and equivocal . . . I would have to find for the appellant in this case. It is unnecessary to emphasize the importance of clarity and certain when freedom is at stake. No authority is needed for the proposition that if real ambiguities are found, or doubts of substance arise, in the construction and application of a statute affecting the liberty of the subject, then that statute should be applied in such a manner as to favor the person against whom it is sought to be enforced.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.