92 …the respondent’s argument overlooks the fact that punitive damages are directed to the quality of the defendant’s conduct, not the quantity (if any) of the plaintiffs loss. As Cory J. observed in Hill v. Church of Scientology, 1995 CanLII 59 (SCC), [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1130, para. 196: “[p]unitive damages bear no relation to what the plaintiff should receive by way of compensation. Their aim is not to compensate the plaintiff, but rather to punish the defendant”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.