This is not to suggest that it is necessary for the board to make positive findings of credibility before this court will exercise its jurisdiction under s. 52(c)(i). In Mahathmasseelan v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), supra, this court felt justified in declaring the claimant to be a Convention refugee because the inconsistencies in her testimony, although not insignificant, were not central to her claim. Moreover, this court expressly noted that while the board made findings with respect to inconsistencies, which affected the claimant's credibility, it did not find a total absence of credibility (at p. 37).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.