When interpreting statutory language, does the language "in context of the statutory framework as a whole" apply?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Ramirez v. Rusich Bros. Enters., Inc., E064185 (Cal. App. 2017):
When interpreting statutory language, we examine the language "'in the context of the statutory framework as a whole in order to determine its scope and purpose and to harmonize the various parts of the enactment.'" (Burns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 717, 724.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of the statutory framework? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 213.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpretation of the California Code of Civil Procedure when it comes to the interpretation of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the statutory language of the Sexual Offences Prevention Act (SVPA) in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for assessing the meaning of the word "interpretation" in the context of a statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted language in the context of a statutory requirement that states that a person must have a valid claim to be registered as a registered invalid? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the rule against interpreting statutory language "in a manner that would render some part of the statute surplusage" support a different interpretation? (California, United States of America)
Is a city's interpretation of a section of the California Civil Code interpreted in the context of an administrative agency's interpretation? (California, United States of America)
