How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Joseph B., In re, 141 Cal.App.3d 864, 190 Cal.Rptr. 639 (Cal. App. 1983):

The People further urge application of the familiar rule of statutory interpretation, expressio unius est exclusio alterius. Under that rule " ' "where a statute enumerates things upon which it is to operate it is to be construed as excluding from its effect all those not expressly mentioned." ' " (People v. Mancha (1974) 39 Cal.App.3d 703, 713, 114 Cal.Rptr. 392.) 6

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the exclusionary rule adopted by the California Supreme Court in the context of Proposition 8? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted the provisions of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 213.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "interpretation" in the context of a section of the California Workers' Comp. Act? (California, United States of America)
Does a statutory amendment to the California Constitution need to be approved by the California Supreme Court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted legislation in the context of the California Courts? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the California Civil Code in the context of "Liberal interpretation"? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the provisions of the California Franchise Tax Act and the California Tax Code in the context of the collection and seizure of a taxpayer's property? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.