When a section of the California Civil Code provides for construction of a statute, how do courts interpret the construction of the statute?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Washington, H045208 (Cal. App. 2018):

need for construction. [Citations.] When the language is susceptible of more than one reasonable interpretation, however, we look to a variety of extrinsic aids, including the ostensible objects to be achieved, the evils to be remedied, the legislative history, public policy, contemporaneous administrative construction, and the statutory scheme of which the statute is a part. [Citations.]' [Citation.]" (People v. Perkins (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 129, 136.)

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Is section 1001.36 of the California Criminal Code a "stressed interpretation" of the law and, if so, would it be impertinent for the court to place a strained interpretation upon the statute? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19 of the California Code of Civil Procedure on liability for property damaged by the construction of a public improvement? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 7272.5 of the California Civil Code, Section 7260, provide relief for a plaintiff who has been displaced by the construction of the Hollywood Freeway? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19996.2(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether an employee has been on an unauthorized leave for a period of time? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 830.6(1) of the California Highway Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether a defendant is immune from liability under the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 17,000 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and how have they interpreted the law? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.