Is section 1001.36 of the California Criminal Code a "stressed interpretation" of the law and, if so, would it be impertinent for the court to place a strained interpretation upon the statute?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Klein, F077903 (Cal. App. 2019):
In conclusion, the legislative intent behind section 1001.36 is clear from the text of the statute and confirmed by the legislative history. "It would be impertinent for this court to place a strained interpretation upon [the] statute merely to bring about a result which, in the enactment of that statute, was neither contemplated nor intended." (People v. Borja (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 378, 382.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is convicted of a sex offence under both sections of the S. 654(1) and (2) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 654, subdivision (a) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
How has section 1204 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted and interpreted by courts? (California, United States of America)
How has section 654 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted in the context of Section 654(1) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
How has section 667.5(b) of the California Criminal Code been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
