Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Angelier v. State Board of Pharmacy, 58 Cal.App.4th 592, 68 Cal.Rptr.2d 213 (Cal. App. 1997):
8 Because construction of a statute presents a question of law, we are not bound by the trial court's interpretation of section 125.3. (Mansell v. Board of Administration (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 539, 544, 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 574.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a section of the California Civil Code provides for construction of a statute, how do courts interpret the construction of the statute? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 17,000 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and how have they interpreted the law? (California, United States of America)
Does section 394 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure apply to the California Department of Justice? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19996.2(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether an employee has been on an unauthorized leave for a period of time? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19 of the California Code of Civil Procedure on liability for property damaged by the construction of a public improvement? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 830.6(1) of the California Highway Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether a defendant is immune from liability under the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
