What is the test for the doctrine of courts of equity to withhold relief from those who have delayed the assertion of their claims for an unreasonable amount of time?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Waller v. Texas & P. Ry. Co., 229 F. 87 (2nd Cir. 1915):
'The doctrine of courts of equity to withhold relief from those who have delayed the assertion of their claims for an unreasonable length of time is thoroughly settled. Its application depends on the circumstances of the particular case. It is not a mere matter of lapse of time, but of change of situation during neglectful repose, rendering it inequitable to afford relief. ' O'Brien v. Wheelock, 184 U.S. 450, 493, 22 Sup.Ct. 354, 46 L.Ed. 636.
We are of the opinion that the complainants waited too long before commencing the action.
The decree is affirmed with costs.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a final, court approved settlement preclude class members from seeking the same relief for the same claims a second time? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a motion is brought before the Superior Court of Justice in the absence of a motion before the Court of Appeal, and the motion has been adjourned for a second time, is there an instance where this court should take jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If an inmate fails to exhaust his claim before asserting them in a lawsuit, can the court dismiss those claims without prejudice? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a litigant claims that a lower court has taken action beyond its jurisdiction, does the court have power to require the lower court to set matters right? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal court exercise jurisdiction over constitutional questions when the claim asserted is so attenuated and unsubstantial that the claim is absolutely devoid of merit? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a habeas petitioner who has defaulted on his federal claims in a state court have to continue to seek relief in a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
