The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Gaines, 295 F.3d 293 (2nd Cir. 2002):
Hence, although the charge did not expressly include the phrase "constructive possession," it contained a thorough description of all its elements. No more is required. See United States v. Evangelista, 122 F.3d 112, 116 (2d Cir.1997) ("[D]efendants are entitled only `to have instructions presented which adequately apprise[] the jury of the elements of the crime charged and their defense.'" (second alteration in original)).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.