Does a jury's instruction on constructive possession of cocaine fail to adequately cover the material elements of conspiracy and aiding and abetting?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Vazquez, 977 F.2d 594 (9th Cir. 1992):

Lizalde's claim fails because the given instructions adequately covered the material elements of conspiracy and aiding and abetting. "A defendant is not entitled to any particular form of an instruction so long as the instructions given fairly and adequately cover the defendant's theories of defense." United States v. Solomon, 825 F.2d 1292, 1295 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1046 (1988). The district judge here instructed the jury that before it could find a defendant guilty of conspiracy, it had to find that the defendant "willfully participated in the unlawful plan, with the intent to advance or further some object or purpose of the conspiracy." Moreover, the judge emphasized later that a defendant could be considered a conspirator if he "knowingly encourages, advises or assists" the unlawful scheme. The instructions thus make it sufficiently clear that active and willful participation was a necessary predicate for a finding of conspiracy. Cf. United States v. Weil, 561 F.2d 1109, 1112 (4th Cir.1977). Lizalde's lawyer in fact acknowledged at trial that the mere presence instruction emerges in one of the general conspiracy instructions. 3 We conclude that the jury instructions were sufficient.

3. Did the district court err in instructing the jury on constructive possession of cocaine?

Other Questions


Is there a reasonable likelihood that a jury found that the written instruction on aiding and abetting had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the jury been instructed on aiding and abetting and conspiracy in a carjacking case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a jury's instructions adequately cover the defense theory when the district court rejected a proposed instruction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Whether jury instructions omit or misstate elements of a statutory crime or adequately cover a defendant's proffered defense? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the instructions given to the jury in possession and constructive possession cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a jury instruction that instructs the jury to establish that an essential element of a criminal offence must be proven? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a jury instruct a jury on aiding and abetting in the light of the evidence introduced? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a proposed instruction in a motion where the question to be resolved is whether other instructions adequately covered the defense theory of the case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the effect of having to have a post-instruction discussion with a jury after receiving an instruction that the jury should consider whether or not to agree to consider a motion of no coercion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a drug dealer have a constructive "possession" or constructive possession of heroin? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.