What is the test for establishing that there was an explicit agreement between appellant and appellant to sustain their convictions for conspiracy?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Green, 523 F.2d 229 (2nd Cir. 1975):
5 We also reject the contention that there was insufficient evidence of an explicit agreement on the part of each appellant to sustain their convictions for conspiracy. "The existence of an agreement may be shown by circumstances indicating that criminal defendants acted in concert to achieve a common goal." Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 124, 94 S.Ct. 2887, 2911, 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974).
6 The affidavit stated:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for establishing that the government has established the existence of a conspiracy and/or conspiracy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Are there any cases where the Supreme Court has found that criminal convictions for common law crimes against individuals who have not been convicted of criminal convictions are sufficient grounds for criminal convictions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that there is a conspiracy to establish that there was one overall agreement? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the error that resulted in a jury convicting all of the appellants of conspiracy against all of them after the conspiracy had ended? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that there is clear established Federal law governing the meaning of the word "clearly established federal law"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for sustaining a conviction for conspiracy to murder? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant challenge his conviction for conspiracy to pervert the course of justice by challenging the sufficiency of evidence to support his conviction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of conspiracy without any involvement in the conspiracy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a Minister's delegate erred by misapplying the so-called "two-part test" in determining that a convicted criminal must be convicted of certain crimes and that the convicted person is or will be a danger to the public? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the burden of establishing that there is insufficient evidence to convict a defendant who has been convicted of a sexual assault? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
