The applicant's third submission is that the Minister's delegate erred by misapplying the so-called "two-part test" in Thompson v. M.C.I. (1996), 118 F.T.R. 269 (F.C.T.D.) that the opinion must be based on the fact that the person had been convicted of certain crimes and that the person is or will be a danger to the public. The applicant argues that the immigration officers who recommended the inquiry did not address this issue.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.