What is the test for establishing that language is sufficient to require the construction of a statutory definition for the purpose of establishing that a section of law does not need to include the words "constant construction" in its construction?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Talega Vill. Ctr. Cmty. Ass'n v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., G051950 (Cal. App. 2016):
will not be construed as conditions precedent in the absence of language plainly requiring such construction." (Rubin v. Fuchs (1969) 1 Cal.3d 50, 53.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When interpreting statutory language, does the language "in context of the statutory framework as a whole" apply? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a section of the California Civil Code requires statutory construction? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpreting a section of the California Civil Code when the language of the section is ambiguous or leaves doubt about its purpose? (California, United States of America)
Is statutory language "does not more than codify a general rule of construction" applicable as well as codifying a general Rule of Construction? (California, United States of America)
Does a section of statutory construction need to be defined in the same language? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1001.36 of the California Criminal Code require a dangerousness finding based on the definition of dangerousness in section 1170.18? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Is constructive possession of a deadly weapon sufficient to establish a defendant was armed with the weapon for purposes of resentencing? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant manipulate the rule of rule 31(d) to bypass the statutory certificate requirement under section 1237.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1950.5(f) of the California Statutory Guidelines for the purpose of recovering security deposits from a recalcitrant landlord? (California, United States of America)
