The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Price, 951 F.2d 1028 (9th Cir. 1991):
Price contends that the evidence supporting his convictions was insufficient. "[W]e must determine, upon viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, whether any rational trier of fact could have found the crimes' essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt." United States v. Ocampo, 937 F.2d 485, 488 (9th Cir.1991).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.