What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been successful in a civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from City of San Jose v. Sharma, 209 Cal.Rptr.3d 420, 5 Cal.App.5th 123 (Cal. App. 2016):
The parties agree that the facts are undisputed, and that we must independently apply statutory and constitutional law to determine whether the trial court was correct. (Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc. (2013) 55 Cal.4th 1185, 1191, 151 Cal.Rptr.3d 827, 292 P.3d 871.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has a valid claim to be a plaintiff in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is it possible for an independent search to determine whether a plaintiff has been successful in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a plaintiff has been successful in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for determining whether a plaintiff has been successful in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been successful in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What factors will be considered when determining whether or not a plaintiff has been successful in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been successful in asserting that a plaintiff is a plaintiff in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been found to be a "defendant" in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
