What is the test for determining whether a person can be found guilty of assault by reason of negligence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Metzger, 22 Cal.App.3d 338, 99 Cal.Rptr. 264 (Cal. App. 1971):
In making this determination we are bound by certain rules recently reiterated in Skelton v. Superior Court, 1 Cal.3d 144, 150, 81 Cal.Rptr. 613, 616, 617, 460 P.2d 485, 488, 489, as follows.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the "reasonable person" standard in determining whether a person is a reasonable person? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence supporting a finding that a person who was found guilty of sexual assault by reason of abuse has been found guilty by a jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has been found guilty of assault by reason of gross negligence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a person can be found guilty of assault by reason of injury when they are not wearing shoes? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining if a defendant has been found guilty of assault by reason of gross negligence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversal of a jury verdict in a motion where a defendant is found not guilty of assault but convicted of assault by reason of negligence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
