What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Yslas, F065132 (Cal. App. 2014):
"Whether the evidence presented at trial is direct or circumstantial, ... the relevant inquiry on appeal remains whether any reasonable trier of fact could have found the
Page 27
defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citations.]" (People v. Towler (1982) 31 Cal.3d 105, 118-119.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant inquiry in determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable jury could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there is substantial evidence by which a reasonable trier of fact could find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a minor guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
