The following excerpt is from Abrams v. U.S., 797 F.2d 100 (2nd Cir. 1986):
[W]e will assume that the acts of the parties and documentation surrounding the transactions reflect the intent of the parties unless we are given some evidence to the contrary. We will not relieve a party from the tax consequences of the form in which he or she appears to have molded a transaction, in the absence of proof that the form does not properly reflect the transaction.
Yamamoto v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 946, 954 (1980).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.