The following excerpt is from Doe v. United States, 915 F.3d 905 (2nd Cir. 2019):
Id. (citation omitted).3 Courts cannot rely solely on "post hoc assertions from a defendant about how he would have pleaded but for his attorneys deficiencies"; we must also "look to contemporaneous evidence to substantiate a defendants expressed preferences." Jae Lee v. United States , U.S. , 137 S.Ct. 1958, 1967, 198 L.Ed.2d 476 (2017). This evidence shows that Doe was deeply concerned about deportation.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.