The following excerpt is from Johnson v. Newburgh Enlarged Sch. Dist., 239 F.3d 246 (2nd Cir. 2000):
Accepting plaintiffs' factual allegations as true, we conclude that a violation of T.J.'s constitutional "right to be free from the use of excessive force" in the "non-seizure, non- prisoner context" occurred here. Rodriguez v. Phillips, 66 F.3d 470, 476 (2d Cir. 1995). Factors to be considered in excessive force claims "[i]n determining whether the constitutional line has been crossed" include "the need for the application of force, the relationship between the need and the amount of force
Page 252
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.