What is the test for a jury to convict an appellant of first degree murder on a theory of natural and probable consequences?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Thomas, A159916 (Cal. App. 2021):
As we said, appellant was not convicted of first degree murder on the theory invalidated in People v. Chiu (2014) 59 Cal.4th 155 (Chiu)which held that an aider and abettor may not be found guilty of first degree murder on a theory of natural and probable consequences3and "[i]n both the jury
Page 7
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a defendant have to appeal against his conviction for first degree premeditated murder based on the natural and probable consequences theory? (California, United States of America)
What if a jury convicted appellant of either first degree or second degree murder and also convicted him of grand theft person? (California, United States of America)
Does the natural and probable consequences doctrine apply to a defendant who is convicted of first degree murder for lying in wait? (California, United States of America)
Does the natural and probable consequences doctrine apply to a defendant who is convicted of first degree murder for lying in wait? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered the issue of whether appellant was convicted of attempted murder under a natural and probable consequences theory? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury rely on reliance on the natural and probable consequences doctrine to support a first degree murder conviction? (California, United States of America)
Does the natural and probable consequences doctrine apply to a defendant who is convicted of first degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a direct perpetrator of a crime be convicted of first degree murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant convicted as an aider and abettor under a natural and probable consequences theory be found guilty of a lesser crime of second degree murder? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant convicted of first degree murder as an aider and abettor under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
