California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. McCrumb, E063205 (Cal. App. 2016):
Defendant contends that, if the jury could have found him guilty as an aider and abettor of first degree premeditated murder based on the natural and probable consequences theory, his conviction should be reversed, citing People v. Chiu (2014) 59 Cal.4th 155, 164-165. However, the jury instructions clearly provided that the jury could only convict defendant of first degree murder under a direct aiding and abetting theory. Even if the trial court improperly instructed the jury on the natural and probable
Page 7
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.