The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Marashi, 913 F.2d 724 (9th Cir. 1990):
Marashi next argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. In evaluating such a claim, we must review the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution to determine whether any rational fact finder could have found the essential elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Adler, 879 F.2d 491, 495 (9th Cir.1988).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.