The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Garcia, 497 F.3d 964 (9th Cir. 2007):
de novo. See United States v. Neill, 166 F.3d 943, 948 (9th Cir.1999). When a defendant argues there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution to determine whether "the jury reasonably could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." United States v. Lothian, 976 F.2d 1257, 1261 (9th Cir.1992) (internal quotation marks omitted).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.