What is the standard of review used in medical malpractice cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Vang, C060682 (Cal. App. 2011):
Under the applicable standard of review, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the judgment to determine if there is substantial evidence from which any rational trier of fact could have found each element beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Johnson (1980) 26 Cal.3d 557, 576-577.) We find substantial evidence supporting both elements.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does section 2337 of the Medical Association's Medical Licence Review Guidelines apply to a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence standard of review in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the "substantial evidence" standard of review in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
Does a substantial evidence analysis in a medical malpractice case have any relation to the "some evidence" standard of review? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant standard of review in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the actual knowledge standard for inference in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of defense in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
