California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Consumer Advocacy Grp., Inc. v. Poolmaster, Inc., A129796, A130903, A131227 (Cal. App. 2013):
the regulations governing listing]; DiPirro v. Bondo Corp. (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 150, 190-192 [court upheld defense where defendant proved no observable effect of chemical on 75 to 85 percent of the population, and rejected as "extreme" plaintiff's proffered standard of no effect on " 'any consumer' "].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.