What is the standard for review of a district court's determination that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Baker v. U.S., 817 F.2d 560 (9th Cir. 1987):
The proper standard for review of a district court's determination that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction under the discretionary function exception is de novo. Chamberlin v. Isen, 779 F.2d 522, 523 (9th Cir.1985).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a federal district court have jurisdiction to hear a claim that a federal court lacks subject matter jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In reviewing a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, can the court consider affidavits or any other evidence properly before the court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal district court remand an action where the court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the federal district court have jurisdiction to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for dismissing a motion by the federal district court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to hear a motion denying a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing the District Court's assumption of subject matter jurisdiction, does the assumption of diversity of citizenship apply? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a federal court lacks subject matter jurisdiction under the Feres doctrine? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the legal conclusions underlying a district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can non-Fedex defendants argue that the District Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
