The following excerpt is from Shaw v. Hiawatha, Inc., 884 F.2d 582 (9th Cir. 1989):
1 Viewed another way, the district court could not properly have dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Where federal jurisdiction is based on an allegation that a federal statute has been violated, dismissal for want of jurisdiction is appropriate only where the federal claim is insubstantial or frivolous. Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. at 682-83; Black v. Payne, 591 F.2d at 86, n. 1. That is not the case here. As we discuss infra, whether the scheme offered by Hiawatha is a security is a rather close question which turns on issues of material fact.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.