The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Radcliff, 914 F.2d 264 (9th Cir. 1990):
"The standard for determining if there has been an impermissible comment on a defendant's right to remain silent at the time of his arrest ... is 'whether the statement was manifestly intended or was of such a character that a jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to [talk].' " United States v. Vera, 701 F.2d 1349, 1362 (11th Cir.1983), (quoting United States v. Deardon, 546 F.2d 622, 625 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 902 (1977)).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.