What is the retroactivity of new federal habeas corpus rules in federal federal courts?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Monge, 16 Cal.4th 826, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 853, 941 P.2d 1121 (Cal. 1997):
1 See Teague v. Lane (1989) 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334, governing the retroactivity of newly announced rules to cases proceeding via habeas corpus in the federal courts.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a federal court grant a motion for writ of habeas corpus to resent the sentence of defendant on count 2 of the charge of assault with intent to pervert the course of justice? (California, United States of America)
Is a new federal constitutional rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions, like that of the Payne case, to apply retroactively to all cases, state or federal? (California, United States of America)
Does the "right ruling, wrong reasoning" rule apply to an evidentiary ruling that required the trial court to make findings of fact? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of a Federal Court finding that a federal court violated a plaintiff's constitutional rights by imposing fees and fines without making a determination of his ability to pay? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to review habeas corpus proceedings on appeal from the Superior Court? (California, United States of America)
What is the result of an appeal to the Court of Appeal of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on a habeas corpus petition? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to deny without prejudice a habeas corpus petition from a defendant who has not filed a petition in the proper lower court? (California, United States of America)
How has the majority of the Court of Appeal treated the issue of withholding funds from a defendant in a habeas corpus proceeding? (California, United States of America)
Is the exclusionary rule interpreted in the federal courts? (California, United States of America)
