The following excerpt is from Meyer v. State, 403 N.Y.S.2d 420, 92 Misc.2d 996 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1978):
"In this connection it is important to note that the elimination of the immunity conferred by prior law should not pose an unreasonable burden on the use of the property since all that is now required is the exercise of reasonable care under the circumstances (Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233, 241, 386 N.Y.S.2d 564, 352 N.E.2d 868, supra ). The defendant can always show that it would have been unduly burdensome to have done more (See 2 Harper and James, Torts, p. 1437)."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.