What is the effect of pleading guilty in a federal civil case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Hussein, E045120 (Cal. App. 1/27/2009), E045120 (Cal. App. 2009):

Defendant here has not filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. He has not obtained a declaration from trial counsel about the concerns the attorney took into account in negotiating the plea, including any immigration consequences. It is certainly not the case that defendant was unaware of the immigration consequences of his plea, as he mentioned several times his expectation and desire to be deported to the Sudan. The supposedly factual matters of defendant's participation in political activities in the Sudan, for which he might be punished, are not matters included in the record on appeal, and have not been established by competent evidence. These matters are speculative only. Appellate counsel has not suggested any available alternative plea or offense as to which defendant might likely have been able to negotiate a disposition with more favorable immigration consequences. Thus, People v. Bautista has no applicability in these circumstances.

Other Questions


What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's recent finding that a defendant who has pleaded guilty to a charge of perverting the course of justice in a sexual assault case has been found guilty of a similar charge in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
In deciding to plead guilty in a criminal case, has there ever been a finding that a defendant was not fully capable of rationally weighing the pros and cons of forgoing a trial and pleading guilty? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found to have improperly used a judge's comments in a federal civil case to justify a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found to have improperly used a judge's comments in a federal civil case to justify a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
Can a federal and state prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct in a federal or federal criminal case? (California, United States of America)
In a civil case, what is the effect of the error by a federal judge in overruling an objection made by a witness? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is a new federal constitutional rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions, like that of the Payne case, to apply retroactively to all cases, state or federal? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.