The following excerpt is from Dunckley v. State, 136 Misc.2d 767, 519 N.Y.S.2d 323 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1987):
The policy behind the former immunity is that the acts or determinations of government officials exercising discretion should not be influenced by the danger of subsequent retaliatory suits for damages. (Poysa v. State of New York, 102 Misc.2d 269, 272, 423 N.Y.S.2d 617.) The predicate for the latter immunity is the notion that the courts may not intrude into the policy-making decisions of coordinate branches of government. (Poysa v. State of New York, supra, at 272, 423 N.Y.S.2d 617.) Moreover, this immunity oftens finds its expression in the concept that the duty of the
Page 327
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.