California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Lopez, 255 Cal.Rptr.3d 526, 453 P.3d 150, 8 Cal.5th 353 (Cal. 2019):
be decided differently by the current justices. This policy, known as the doctrine of stare decisis, is based on the assumption that certainty, predictability and stability in the law are the major objectives of the legal system; i.e., that parties should be able to regulate their conduct and enter into relationships with reasonable assurance of the governing rules of law. " ( Moradi-Shalal v. Firemans Fund Ins. Companies (1988) 46 Cal.3d 287, 296, 250 Cal.Rptr. 116, 758 P.2d 58.) Thus, the failure of a court to adhere to its precedents undermines the courts credibility as a judicial body. But even
[453 P.3d 170]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.