What is the current state of California Supreme Court policy of stare decisis?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Lopez, 255 Cal.Rptr.3d 526, 453 P.3d 150, 8 Cal.5th 353 (Cal. 2019):

be decided differently by the current justices. This policy, known as the doctrine of stare decisis, is based on the assumption that certainty, predictability and stability in the law are the major objectives of the legal system; i.e., that parties should be able to regulate their conduct and enter into relationships with reasonable assurance of the governing rules of law. " ( Moradi-Shalal v. Firemans Fund Ins. Companies (1988) 46 Cal.3d 287, 296, 250 Cal.Rptr. 116, 758 P.2d 58.) Thus, the failure of a court to adhere to its precedents undermines the courts credibility as a judicial body. But even

[453 P.3d 170]

Other Questions


What is the current state of California Supreme Court case law regarding Section 7 of the Consumer Goods Pricing Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of California Supreme Court ruling on a challenge to the instructions of the S.S.A.B.J. standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of California Supreme Court majority's concern that a juror might misunderstand the jury instruction? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
Is there any precedent for assuming that a plaintiff in a California Supreme Court case will be able to sue for damages in the context of state-wide congressional redistricting? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have authority to set a cap on the amount of regulatory fees paid by the California Assembly? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of the California Supreme Court on the "California Bill of Rights"? (California, United States of America)
Does the majority of the California Supreme Court have found a Fifth Amendment violation even when the state has not technically "compelled" a defendant to produce their testimonial disclosures? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of the California Supreme Court ruling that a crematorium can refuse to comply with a mandate issued by the California Board of Directors? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any power or authority to interpret a section of the California Penal Code that is ambiguous and ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.