What is the current state of California Supreme Court case law regarding Section 7 of the Consumer Goods Pricing Act?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from R. Spriggs Co. v. Adolph Coors Co., 156 Cal.Rptr. 738, 94 Cal.App.3d 419 (Cal. App. 1979):

5 The entire section was held unconstitutional in Rice v. Alcoholic Bev. etc. Appeals Bd. (1978) 21 Cal.3d 431, 146 Cal.Rptr. 585, 579 P.2d 476. This holding was triggered by the federal Consumer Goods Pricing Act of 1975 (89 State. 801) and is not otherwise relevant to this appeal.

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of California Supreme Court majority's concern that a juror might misunderstand the jury instruction? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any power or authority to interpret a section of the California Penal Code that is ambiguous and ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any authority or authority to amend or amend a section of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure to make it easier for a plaintiff to sue for damages? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted a section of the California Guardianship Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of California Supreme Court ruling on a challenge to the instructions of the S.S.A.B.J. standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of California Supreme Court policy of stare decisis? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.