California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bernik, C071777 (Cal. App. 2016):
Under the common law doctrine of transferred intent, "one's criminal intent follows the corresponding criminal act to its unintended consequences. . . . [T]he reasoning applies equally to carry the lack of criminal intent to the unintended consequences and thus preclude criminal responsibility." (People v. Matthews (1979) 91 Cal.App.3d 1018, 1023 (Matthews), italics omitted.) Accordingly, "the doctrine of self-defense is available to insulate one from criminal responsibility where his act, justifiably in self-defense, inadvertently results in the injury of an innocent bystander." (Id. at p. 1024.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.