How have courts interpreted the doctrine of common law in the context of medical malpractice?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Flood, 18 Cal.4th 470, 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 180, 957 P.2d 869 (Cal. 1998):
12 Accordingly, People v. Phillips, supra, 64 Cal.2d 574, 51 Cal.Rptr. 225, 414 P.2d 353, and its progeny are overruled to the extent they are inconsistent with our conclusion in this case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts treated medical malpractice in the context of medical malpractices? (California, United States of America)
When a judge refers to "common sense, common-sense, popular parlance" or "common-sense", does this mean that the judge must be able to rely solely on common sense or common- sense? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted consent in the context of a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the defense of necessity in the context of medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in medical malpractice cases where an operation has failed to produce the expected result? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of sovereign immunity in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How has section 855.4 of the California Medical Code been interpreted in the context of medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the doctrine of negligent misrepresentation in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of "peculiar" or "special risk" in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
