California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Keshmiri, G054611 (Cal. App. 2019):
In a criminal case, due process requires the prosecution to prove every element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. (In re Winship (1970) 397 U.S. 358, 364.) And when the case is tried before a jury, they must decide whether the prosecution has carried its burden in that regard. (Sandstrom v. Montana (1979) 442 U.S. 510, 520-523.) Therefore, trial court instructions that require the jury to make presumptions that effectively establish a disputed element of the charged offense are unconstitutional. (Ibid.) The problem with such mandatory presumptions is that they
Page 13
undermine the presumption of innocence and invade the core factfinding function of the jury. (Ibid.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.