What is the burden of proving every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Kinloch, D068564 (Cal. App. 2016):
"The prosecution has the burden of proving every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt." (People v. Lopez (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1228 (Lopez).) " 'To determine whether the prosecution has introduced sufficient evidence to meet this burden, courts apply the "substantial evidence" test.' " (Id. at pp. 1228, 1229.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the prosecution's burden to prove every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
When will a prosecutor be found to have made a claim of misconduct when they argued "the burden of proving every element of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt"? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving all the elements of a crime have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the prosecution's burden to prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
How has the US Courts treated the burden of proving every element of the charged crimes beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is it improper for a prosecutor to misstate the law generally and particularly the prosecution's burden of proving every element of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of reasonable doubt apply to a defendant's due process right to appeal against a jury verdict that diminished the prosecution's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor prohibited from misstating the law to reduce the burden to prove each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Can a reasonable trier of fact have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
