The following excerpt is from Lyndell C. R., Matter of, 102 Misc.2d 723, 423 N.Y.S.2d 1007 (N.Y. City Ct. 1980):
As to the question of prejudice to the respondent prior to her Formal request for the return of the child, it is untenable that the burden of making formal demand for the return of the child should be borne by the respondent. Indeed, the court's reasoning in Duchesne v. Sugarman, 566 F.2d 817 (Ct.App. 2d Cir., 1977) is particularly apposite here: "(T)he state cannot constitutionally 'sit back and wait' for the parent to institute judicial proceedings . . . The burden of initiating judicial review must be shouldered by the government. We deal here with an uneven situation in which the government has a far greater familiarity with the legal procedures available for testing its action." At 828.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.