The Minister made an alternative argument. Even if there was a "transfer to a child", that transfer was not of the type covered by s. 73(5). The Minister relied in this regard on the majority judgment of this Court in The Queen v. Paxton,10 in which my brother Robertson J.A. said that in his opinion:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.