What evidence does the court have to consider to support the proposition that the owner of a parcel of land is obligated to dedicate the land to the public use?

Respondents state, and appellants do not deny, that the [218 Cal.App.2d 555] evidence before us is substantially the same, if not the same, as that before us on the prior appeal. It was held therein that '[t]he record in the instant case is devoid of clear unequivocal acts of the owner to dedicate the land to public use.' (Flavio v. McKenzie, supra, 177 Cal.App.2d p. 277, 2 Cal.Rptr. p. 82.) We reaffirm this holding.

There not being a sufficient offer of dedication, the question of acceptance thereof by the public becomes moot.