What is the evidence supporting the finding that there is insufficient evidence to support the findings of the trial court?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Lost Hills Travel Center, Inc. v. Birk, F052301 (Cal. App. 4/18/2008), F052301 (Cal. App. 2008):
Appellant does not contend there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court's express and implied findings of fact. Accordingly, we set forth the facts in the light most favorable to the judgment. (See Osumi v. Sutton (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 1355, 1360.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an appeal against a finding that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the finding? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support a finding that the evidence against the appellant was not as strong as the trial court concluded? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for insufficiency of evidence in a trial where the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict? (California, United States of America)
Is insufficient evidence sufficient to support a jury's finding that there was insufficient evidence? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial on a charge of sexual assault brought by defendant Perez, who has pleaded not guilty to the charge, is the evidence insufficient to support his claim of insufficiency of evidence? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court have to accept the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court ruling that resolves conflicts in the evidence entitled to greater deference from a reviewing court than a similar finding in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
