What are the implications of Proposition 8 of the California Supreme Court?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Huntsman, 152 Cal.App.3d 1073, 200 Cal.Rptr. 89 (Cal. App. 1984):
2 Because the crime at issue occurred before June 9, 1982, the provisions of Proposition 8 (Cal. Const., art. I, 28) are not applicable to this case. (People v. Smith (1983) 34 Cal.3d 251, 262, 193 Cal.Rptr. 692, 667 P.2d 149.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted the exclusionary rule adopted by the California Supreme Court in the context of Proposition 8? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of the California Supreme Court ruling that a crematorium can refuse to comply with a mandate issued by the California Board of Directors? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have authority to set a cap on the amount of regulatory fees paid by the California Assembly? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the California Supreme Court's decision in the case of Fogarty v. Superior Court? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of the California Supreme Court's recent decisions on same-sex marriage? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of the California Supreme Court on the "California Bill of Rights"? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any power or authority to interpret a section of the California Penal Code that is ambiguous and ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
