What are the evidentiary rulings of the trial court for abuse of evidentiary evidence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Hernandez v. Gardner, B251309 (Cal. App. 2015):
We review the evidentiary rulings of the trial court for abuse of discretion, and will not disturb those rulings in the absence of a showing of a manifest abuse of that discretion. (See e.g., People v. Bolin (1998) 18 Cal.4th 297, 321-322.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law that states that in the absence of evidence of abuse, the reviewing court will not disturb the ruling of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
How will the courts review a trial court's decision to exclude evidence for abuse of abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
Can an evidentiary ruling be reversed if the trial court admitted or denied evidence of abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does the "right ruling, wrong reasoning" rule apply to an evidentiary ruling that required the trial court to make findings of fact? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for appeal against the evidentiary rulings of the trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances of the crime scene evidence will be admitted during the penalty phase of a penalty trial, does the trial court error not to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court ruling that resolves conflicts in the evidence entitled to greater deference from a reviewing court than a similar finding in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
