Similarly, in Wilband v. R., 1966 CanLII 3 (SCC), [1967] S.C.R. 14 at 21, 60 W.W.R. 292, 2 C.R.N.S. 29, [1967] 2 C.C.C. 6 at 11 [B.C.], Fauteux J. stated: The value of a psychiatrist’s opinion may be affected to the extent to which it may rest on second-hand source material; but that goes to the weight and not to the receivability in evidence of the opinion, which opinion is no evidence of the truth of the information but evidence of the opinion formed on the basis of that information. [emphasis added]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.