The test to determine the liability of a lawyer for costs is a two part one. First, the court is to inquire as to whether a lawyer’s conduct falls within rule 57.07(1) in that the lawyer caused costs to be incurred unnecessarily. The second step is to consider the extreme caution principle enunciated in Young v. Young and whether in the circumstances the imposition of costs against the lawyer personally is warranted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.