What are the quantum of costs incurred in determining whether a plaintiff is entitled to full recovery costs?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Prokopchuk v. Borowski, 2010 ONSC 4554 (CanLII):
In determining the quantum of costs, I must consider whether either party is entitled to full recovery costs. Such costs are awarded when bad faith is established or when a Rule 18 offer has been “matched or bettered”: Nielsen v. Nielsen, [2007] O.J. 4397 (S.C.J.) at para. 30.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When will the court defer the determination of entitlement and quantum of costs on an interlocutory motion to the trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining the determination of a plaintiff's costs in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to both costs and costs of a motion to set aside a default judgment? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is entitled to damages for refusing to undergo a recommended treatment? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to pay the costs of preparing a Bill of Costs and costs submission in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is entitled to a lump sum of damages from the Court of Appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a substantial indemnity and cost of costs for breach of trust and misrepresentation? (Ontario, Canada)
How should a court consider misconduct in the context of determining a plaintiff's costs? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a court to determine whether a party to a claim against a property is entitled to sue the property owner? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining a quantum of costs under Rule 24(12)? (Ontario, Canada)
